"Reaction [beta]"

Can you count on voting machines? 7 Jan 2008

New York Times Magazine has a disturbing report on the usability, stability and effectiveness of voting machines:

"In the last three election cycles, touch-screen machines have become one of the most mysterious and divisive elements in modern electoral politics. Introduced after the 2000 hanging-chad debacle, the machines were originally intended to add clarity to election results. But in hundreds of instances, the result has been precisely the opposite: they fail unpredictably, and in extremely strange ways; voters report that their choices 'flip' from one candidate to another before their eyes; machines crash or begin to count backward; votes simply vanish. (In the 80-person town of Waldenburg, Ark., touch-screen machines tallied zero votes for one mayoral candidate in 2006 -- even though he's pretty sure he voted for himself.) Most famously, in the November 2006 Congressional election in Sarasota, Fla., touch-screen machines recorded an 18,000-person 'undervote' for a race decided by fewer than 400 votes."

Next article: OLPC loses Intel
Previous article: Is Art Lebedev working for Apple?

Bookmark this page

Add this page to your list of social bookmarks.

1 comment so far

buy oem software online 16 Jan 2012 12:15 AM

GqISmm comment4

Trackbacks

To create a TrackBack to this entry simply append ping/ to the permalink URL for this page.

Send page to a friend

Enter your email address to subscribe to our free newsletter.
Your email address will never be sold or given out to anybody.