"Reaction [beta]"

Locking users in 1 Nov 2007

We've been meaning to post this for some time now...Privacy International has issued a great report - called "Dumb Design or Dirty Tricks?" - that describes how popular websites are failing to provide an easy or obvious way for users to delete their accounts. Here's an excerpt:

"Amazon provided the most blatant example of companies that refuse to provide account delete facilities...creating an account is relatively simple...However nowhere on the site can a customer actually delete an account. A trawl through all the 'useful information' statements ('customer charter', 'privacy notice' and 'privacy policy', 'security guarantee' and even 'sign out from our site') reveals nothing about closing your account, deleting your personal details, or terminating your relationship with Amazon. Even the site's search function is useless for this: you can only search for products for purchase, not for information on how to manage your account. In fact, a search for 'delete account' even points to advertisements from 'sponsors' on how to open bank accounts."

Of course, this isn't due to a lack of attention to usability or "dumb design", it's a "dirty trick" - it's a deliberate attempt to subjugate users' attempts to leave. On the face of it, this type of tactic seems to provide no obvious business benefit to those who employ it. Customers who want to escape these services have (presumably) already decided that they aren't going to spend any more money on them (and annoying these customers with a complex "unsubscribe" process is hardly going to help change their minds about this). However, look a little more closely and you'll see that there's a lot of value associated with hanging onto dormant accounts.

Firstly, the size of an online company's customer-base is a key element in defining its market value and also, its worth to advertisers. Thus, an unscrupulous company can boost its perceived value by including both active and dormant user accounts when quoting user numbers (i.e. as opposed to quoting the number of active users alone - which would provide a far more accurate picture of the state of the nation). Secondly, for sites that use collaborative filtering technology (e.g. to provide product recommendations based on the behaviour of like-minded individuals), user accounts provide a useful source of information about people's purchasing habits, regardless of whether they are dormant or not. Thirdly, there's always the chance that some deserters will want to come back, thus retaining their accounts provides them with an easy means of doing so.

So while a confusing account-deletion process may be unscrupulous, it certainly isn't unprofitable.

[via fulminate]

Next article: Google.com designed for Google
Previous article: Byroglyphics

Bookmark this page

Add this page to your list of social bookmarks.

1 comment so far

SEO 4 Nov 2007 04:58 AM

Yes this is something i've noticed alot of, and as you point out the data is quite valuable for these sites/companies.

I friend had a bad experience last week and wanted to delete his account, not being good with the internet he couldn't work out how so we logged only to find it required jumping through several virtual hoops which included manually sending an Email which "bounced" a few days later because it wasn't in the correct format despite them not indicating anywhere what the format was.

It was a blatant attempt to make the user just give up trying so they could retain the account and data.

Email lists are quite valuable as well, especially when targetted to the users likes/dislikes so the companies hell bent on keeping your data are probably selling it as well.

Carly,

Post a comment






Basic HTML (strong, em, a, etc.) is allowed in your comments.

Trackbacks

To create a TrackBack to this entry simply append ping/ to the permalink URL for this page.

Send page to a friend

Enter your email address to subscribe to our free newsletter.
Your email address will never be sold or given out to anybody.